This is only a test.
The topic-comment stative is something I made to function as the Umu copula. When both are unmarked, the meaning is “is comment, topic” or using English word order “topic is comment”.
Topics can possess comments. This incorporates the comment into the topic, creating a new topic.
Before, I’d always marked the shift on the topic. Like this:
But with my chosen word order—and because the same shift must also mark possessives—this didn’t really work. It didn’t make much sense orthographically either because the shift also changed the stress of the former comment, leaving the reader one step behind.
This time I’ll try marking the comment instead of the topic. The site of the vowel shift and and stress shift is now the same place and meets the readers eye first.
It’s also less ambiguous when the new comment comes into play.
It seems to work even with multiple comments.
It also seems to work as both the possessor and possessee.
zö’ö ‘ötu köpö hupe köve
The black fat dog’s hair is pretty.
köpö hupe köva ‘öme
black GEN\fat dog GEN\1
My fat dog is black.
köpö hopa köva ‘öme
kőp hópa kvá.wme
black fat dog GEN\1
My dog is black and fat.
This is as far as I’ve gotten. I’m not sure what happens with more complex noun phrases yet or whether it’s actually viable. But it’s a good start.
And just noticing this now. It looks like shift in this manifestation make verbs adjectives and puts nouns in the genitive. I hadn’t looked at it that way.
What do you think of this new system? Is it solvent?
Oh forgot about compounds. Now that the modifier is marked and not the head, the issue of which part of the compound gets marked our both or “look how long that crazy marked compound is” goes away. They’ll just s it there in this original for.
It may start getting hairy when the compound is in the genitive or when there’s multiple genitives. This may or may not work here.
But who knows? Maybe it does work.